I think we all know that something is rotten in the state of college athletics. I think we’ve known for a while now but recently, through the exceedingly brazen actions of players, coaches, school administrators and boosters, the proverbial camel’s back may have been broken. And with conferences disintegrating as we speak someone needs to come in and make some sense of this debacle. Congress couldn’t do it. ESPN attempted to give its own objective review (whilst paying millions to the NCAA) and unsurprisingly failed. So, what the hell, I’ll give it a shot. But, frankly, all the ills of college sports, football in particularly, are too much to handle for one man. So I am just going to tackle conference realignment (I will leave the paying of players to the 50,000 word article in this month’s Atlantic). In the next few weeks, several of the major conferences are going to look fairly different. Some will expand, while others may disintegrate completely. And, because this is all about money, (let’s not kid ourselves) we might as well try and maximize all potential cash by providing the best possible matchups.
So in this plan the Big 12 and Big East are things of the past. Don’t be so shocked though. Remember the Southwest Conference? It had storied history too but people got over it. So this has been done before. All the Big East & Big 12 teams will be absorbed into 5 new, 16-team Super Conferences each consisting of 4 four-team “pods.” (This part is definitely not an original idea. This has been floating out for a while.) These conferences would consist of four power conferences and one expanded second-tier Conference USA. Each team would play the 3 other teams in their pod each year (strengthening old rivalries and cultivating new ones) and then 5 of the other teams in their conference (switched around randomly each year). Each team would then also have the ability to schedule two non-conference games. No one wants to see Florida lose the ability to play FSU or Clemson-South Carolina, Utah-BYU, Texas-Texas A&M, etc. This would also lead to better quality of play as there would be fewer cupcakes and more evenly matched contests. So, ok, we are up to a 10 game regular season so far. Then the winners of each pod move into a four-team, two week conference championship to determine the conference winners. These games will utilize regional stadiums in a similar way as the early December bowl games. Each Conference Champ will then be given an automatic bid to the 8-team, three week National Championship with the other 3 spots being filled by three wild card teams. These teams, unfortunately, would need to be selected by some sort of BCS computer program factoring in strength of schedule (further reason not to schedule cupcakes), quality of victory, record, etc. Then these teams battle it out for the crown. Now, I know what you’re saying. You’ve got these kids playing an NFL schedule! 15 games! Insanity. My response would be while, yes, the top teams are playing more games it isn’t all that many more. If Alabama goes to their conference championship and a bowl, they will have played 14 games this year. Same with Stanford. Same with Ohio St., Oklahoma and Florida. 14 games has become the standard for a team with championship aspirations. So does adding one game really add all that much more? In the words of Kevin McAllister “I don’t think so.” If there are any flaws (and trust me there are many ,I’m sure) it is that your lower level teams, i.e. your Dukes, UVAs, and Kentuckys, etc., will now go from having 11 or 12 games a year to only having 10. My response would be 1) I am sure there would be some sort of conference revenue sharing to ease your troubles and 2) get better and that won’t be a problem.
So now we’ve got a system where the best team has an avenue to prove that they are the best team in the conference and then ultimately the best team in the land. So now let’s look at the restructured conferences. New teams are bolded.
ACC
Duke UNC NC St Wake Forest | Florida St. Miami Clemson Ga. Tech | Syracuse UCONN Pitt Boston College | Maryland UVA Va. Tech WVU |
Big Central (Formerly Big 10/11/12)
Michigan Ohio St. Michigan St. Penn St. | Nebraska Missouri Kansas Kansas St. | Illinois Indiana Northwestern Purdue | Minnesota Wisconsin Iowa Iowa St. |
Big West (Formerly PAC 12)
Washington Wash St. Oregon Oregon St. | Texas Oklahoma Texas Tech Okla St. | USC UCLA Cal Stanford | Colorado Utah Arizona Arizona St. |
SEC
Florida Georgia South Carolina LSU | Auburn Alabama Miss St. Ole Miss | Kentucky Louisville Vanderbilt Tennessee | Texas A&M Baylor TCU Arkansas |
Conference USA (The Other Guys)
Tulsa New Mexico SMU Houston | UCF USF UAB So. Miss. | BYU Boise St. UNLV San Diego St. | Rutgers Cincy Memphis ECU |
To flesh out the new Conference USA, Fresno St. and UTEP are taking the place of TCU and Boise St in the Mountain West as TCU and the Broncos are headed up to USA. Rice, Tulane and Marshall are also being relegated to the new Mountain West in favor of UNLV, San Diego St. and New Mexico. This conference is then combined with the WAC to form the new WAC conference. This league is not given an automatic bid to the tournament but could play their way into one of the at-large spots. Also to fill out a sixteen team conference I’ve brought up Montana from the minor leagues. They seem to do pretty ok down there so they should acclimate themselves well.
So the new Western Athletic Conference now looks like this aka The Little West:
Rice La. Tech Tulane Marshall | Hawaii Air Force Fresno St. San Jose St. | Nevada Utah St. Idaho UTEP | Wyoming Colorado St. New Mexico St. Montana |
So who gets screwed? Obviously Rutgers probably deserves better than a spot in the thrown together Conference USA but frankly they just haven’t been good enough in football or hoops to warrant a place at the big kids table. Same with South Florida and Cincy but they don’t really fit into the landscape either. USF almost made it into the new SEC but Louisville’s hoops and natural rivalry with Kentucky won out.... Maybe you could say BYU gets screwed out of a spot with the big conferences but it doesn’t look like the PAC 12 wants them because of their religious affiliations. If the Cougars end up staying independent (which would be dumb because they could be competing for the USA crown every year) UNLV would join USA and Hawaii would join the Mountain West. ... The MWC and other smaller conferences (the WAC, MAAC, Sun Belt and WAC) do basically become third-tier teams in this model but if they can go 10-0 and win their conference title, there is still a shot for one of the at-large bids to the Championship tournaments. There could also be some sort of relegation system with Conf USA but I haven’t fully fleshed that out. ....The new system also probably screws the Golden Domers and maybe pushes them into joining a major conference because teams only get 2 non-conference games, Notre Dame may have difficulty scheduling the top teams. ...Certainly Marshall, Rice and Tulane will argue that they deserve better than the new look WAC but, seriously, when was the last time any of these teams made any noise? In hoops or football? The last time Rice played in a meaningful football game it was 1956 and Marshall’s football glory days with Randy Moss and Pennington were when they were an I-AA team. Since they’ve hit the big-time all they’ve done is get throttled by WVU. Their move to the Little West at least gives them a shot.
But what about Big East Hoops?
Unfortunately, as this whole plan (and the country in general) mostly centers around football, the non-football supporting teams of the Big East kind of get screwed over. As the Big East football schools head to the ACC, SEC and Conf USA, the basketball schools are left out in the cold. But are they going to sit around and cry about it? Hell no. They are going to rally the wagons and keep this ship afloat. I love mixing metaphors. With the departures of the teams above, the currently bloated Big East slims down to an 8-team, pretty good, not great basketball/other sports league that retains the Big East name and several of the teams that made the Big East great. Thus the new and possibly improved Big East Hoops Conference looks like:
Georgetown Villanova | Depaul Marquette | Seton Hall Notre Dame | Providence St. Johns |
Pretty decent if you ask me.
So why this plan is good:
ACC: Brings in 4 teams that strengthen the quality of its football, while also make it bar-none the top basketball conference in the land. An ACC hoops tournament with UNC-Duke-UCONN-Syracuse-Pitt- Maryland? Umm. Yes, please. This move also stretches the reach of the ACC North and West by adding New England and Pennsylvania. It also renews old Big East rivalries including UConn-Boston College and WVU-Va. Tech. Further, the pods work geographically. Carolina, South, Northeast, Mid-Atlantic.
Big Central: Becomes THE conference for the Midwest. Decent adds for football but the additions of Kansas and Mizzou make this a much deeper hoops conference. Good geographic matchups in the pods. Nebraska rejoins some of its old Big 12 brethren while Iowa St gets matched up with Iowa.
PAC 16: Addition of the Texas/Oklahoma team adds serious flash to the PAC as a football conference. The transition shouldn’t be too rough either as most of these teams already practice the PAC 12-air it out and play average defense philosophy. The pods set up well and make sense: Northwest/California/Mountain West/Texlahoma. Lots of money will be made with a set-up like this. Imagine USC meeting Texas in the Conference Championship game at the Cotton Bowl or the Rose Bowl. Epic.
SEC: Adding depth to an already deep football legacy. TCU, A&M and Baylor are solid additions that make sense geographically while Louisville brings good basketball and is a natural rival with Kentucky. Also the pod set-up allows Arkansas to relive its old SWAC days by being matched up with A&M and Baylor. Also a pod with Georgia, Florida, LSU and South Carolina? Just sick.
So there it is. Unfortunately, the Plan's biggest problem is that it is too logical. The NCAA hates logic.